the TUDOR TUTOR
Your cheeky guide to the dynastyArchive for Media
Let’s Kick Off the Anne Boleyn Collection Book Tour!
I am psyched and honoured to be the kick-off point for the Anne Boleyn Collection book tour! My friend Claire Ridgway has just published her first book, The Anne Boleyn Collection, and she’s whisking around cyberspace this week answering your questions, chatting in interviews, and giving away signed copies of her hot new book and other Tudor-y goodies.
Anyone who sent me questions for Claire is eligible to win a signed copy of the book PLUS another surprise! The winner will be announced on Friday. For now, sit back and enjoy reading this Q & A as Claire tackles some of your questions …
Q: Do you think Henry ever regretted what happened to Anne (and her family) and do you think he suffered from some sort of mental illness? There were so many heads rolling that he had to have had some regrets. Even his good “friends” were subject to the hatchet! – Cathy
Claire: It is tempting to believe that Henry was mentally ill or that he suffered some kind of brain damage as a result of his jousting accident, but I don’t believe that his behaviour was down to illness or injury. In my opinion, Henry had always had that side to him. We have to remember that his father had come to the throne through challenging the king and defeating him in battle, so there were those who believed that the Tudors were usurpers. Henry VIII had to put forward a strong and dominant image; he had to tackle any challenges quickly and brutally.
As for Anne Boleyn’s fall, I do think that, in private, Henry must have regretted it. I just can’t see how you can go from loving someone so passionately to having them executed without feeling remorse at some point.
Q: Why did so many of his wives lose so many babies so young? — Fran
Claire: I think the miscarriages and stillbirths were simply a sign of the times. They were just unlucky. There are a multitude of reasons for miscarriage, stillbirths and infant mortality, and Catherine and Anne were living in times when antenatal and postnatal care were pretty basic, infections were rife and good hygiene was not a priority. Even today, many women experience miscarriage after miscarriage with no real medical reason for them, and infant mortality rates are high in developing countries. Pregnancy and childbirth are still dangerous for both mother and baby.
Q: We know Henry VIII’s height but what about his wives? It helps put it all into perspective. –Karissa
Claire: I’m not sure of their exact heights but Anne Boleyn was described as being of middling stature, Chapuys described Jane Seymour as of “middle stature”, Catherine Howard was supposed to be plump and petite, Anne of Cleves was described by Marillac (the French ambassador) as tall and I read that Catherine Parr’s tomb suggested a height of around 5’2”. I’ve read that Catherine of Aragon was short but I’m not sure of the source for that.
In his report of his examination of the remains thought to have been of Anne Boleyn, Dr Mouat noted that she was about 5′ to 5′ 3” in height.
Q: I know this question sounds blokie, sorry about that, but was Anne sexually trained like Nell Gwynne was? I ask because she spent time in France (where it was much more sexually outgoing) and she kept Henry dangling for so long, I just wondered how she did it. — Simon
Claire: There is no evidence that Anne was sexually trained or that she had any kind of sexual experience before Henry VIII. The French court may have had a reputation but Anne’s mistress, Queen Claude, was known for her moral and virtuous household and would have expected her ladies to guard their reputations. We just don’t know how far Anne let Henry go before they consummated their relationship in late 1532 but neither would have wanted to risk an illegitimate child and Anne wanted to keep her virtue intact.
Q: I am always curious to know if there is any evidence to what type of relationship that Anne had with her sister Mary? Did they even like each other? — The Tudor Cafe
Claire: We just don’t know the details of their relationship. If we take 1499/1500 as a birthdate for Mary and 1501 for Anne then they were obviously close in age and spent their childhood together. They were separated when Anne went to the Low Countries in 1513 but would have met again in France in 1514 when they served Mary Tudor temporarily. We don’t know what happened to Mary when Mary Tudor returned to England in 1515. It could be that she also returned to England leaving Anne in France, but the sisters met again at court in 1522.
Mary was chosen to accompany Anne and Henry VIII on their trip to Calais in 1532 and attended Anne at her coronation in 1533, so the sisters must surely have been close at that point. Obviously, Mary was banished from court in 1534 after her secret marriage to William Stafford without Anne’s permission, and we don’t know if the sisters were ever reconciled.
Q: I would like to know about Anne’s relationship with her mother. You hear so much about her father and his influence, but where was mom through all of Anne’s challenges? — Claudia
Claire: Anne’s mother, Elizabeth Boleyn (née Howard), acted as Anne’s chaperone during Anne and Henry’s courtship so she was right there with her daughter. Elizabeth also attended her pregnant daughter at her coronation in 1533, riding in one of the carriages in the procession.
Anne’s love for her mother is again shown in words she spoke to Sir William Kingston at her arrival at the Tower after her arrest on the 2nd May 1536: “O, my mother, [thou wilt die with] sorow” LP x.793 So I think the two women were very close and I’m sure that Anne would have confided in Elizabeth during those years of waiting.
Q: I think that Margaret of Austria and Marguerite of Navarre are strong intelligent fascinating women . Which one of these women made a stronger impact on Anne’s view of religion and role of women in politics/govt? — Rebecca H.
Claire: Tough one! I think that Anne’s short time at the highly-cultured court of Margaret of Austria showed her that a woman could be powerful and also gave her her love of art, illuminated manuscripts and music. She also learned about the tradition of courtly love there. Her time there, and her time with Queen Claude, would have prepared her for running her own household.
We don’t know the extent of Anne’s relationship with Marguerite of Navarre but I suspect that Marguerite’s passion for Reform and her belief in having a personal relationship with God had an impact on Anne. Marguerite never separated herself from Rome, she was passionate about reform within the Catholic Church, and the same can be said of Anne. Anne’s ‘flavour’ of Reform was definitely more French than German and Anne’s links with protégés of Marguerite’s, men like Clément Marot and Nicholas Bourbon, and books printed under Marguerite’s patronage, show how similar the women were in their religious outlook. Historian James Carley sees Marguerite as “an intellectual model” for Anne and I have to agree.
Q: When you were doing your research for your books…what is the favourite/most exciting thing that you uncovered/found that you didn’t know before you started? — Heather
Claire: Another tough one because there have been so many! Recently, I think it’s been Thomas Boleyn’s links with Reformers. Often, Thomas Boleyn is seen as a political animal who was only interested in religion in a political way, and even as a man who did not agree with George and Anne’s reformist beliefs, but it’s just not true. Eric Ives mentions correspondence between Thomas Boleyn and Thomas Tebold so I started digging into this relationship. In an index of Kent wills, Tebold is listed as a vicar, scholar and godson of Thomas Boleyn, and Ives writes of how Thomas Boleyn supported Tebold’s travels around Europe.
We know from letters that Tebold sent Boleyn a copy of an epistle by French Reformer, Clément Marot, who had been forced to flee France due to his religious views and it appears that a Reformist printer, Reyner Wolf, acted as a go between for their correspondence – very cloak and dagger! Anyway, it made me realise that Thomas Boleyn was risking his reputation and his life by corresponding with Reformists like this so his faith was real.
Q: What was the first book or movie that got you so interested in the Tudor era, specifically Anne Boleyn? — Rebecca A.
Claire: I first got interested in Anne Boleyn at school when I did a project on Henry and his six wives when I was 11, but it was watching “The Tudors” which I think must have sparked off the dream I had about Anne’s execution. That very vivid dream then led me to set up The Anne Boleyn Files to share my research.
Q: Henry VIII supposedly destroyed all portraits of Anne Boleyn. Do you think one will ever be discovered that he possibly missed? I know we have the NPG one, the coin with her image and the miniature in Elizabeth I’s ring, I’m talking about a real portrait done at the time she was Queen. — Lois
Claire: I believe that there is still one in existence in a private collection. Eric Ives writes of how a full-length portrait is known to have been in the possession of Lord Lumley in 1590 and existed as late as 1773.
Q: At the end of the day, are you convinced that Henry married Anne out of love? If so, what evidence (in your mind) supports this? Furthermore, are you convinced that Anne was Henry’s true and only love? — Lynn
Claire: Yes, I am 100% sure that Henry VIII married Anne Boleyn out of love. I don’t think he would have been willing to move heaven and earth to marry Anne if he hadn’t loved her. The couple had to wait around 7 years to be together properly and faced a great deal of opposition, so I feel that it was more than infatuation.
Henry spoke of Jane being his true wife and I’m sure he loved her, particularly as she gave him the greates gift of all, a son, but I don’t think he loved her in the same passionate and intensive way that he loved Anne Boleyn. Perhaps it was just a different kind of love. Nobody knows exactly how Henry felt so it is hard to say and we have to respect Henry’s words on the matter. I believe that he loved each of his wives, except Anne of Cleves, and probably loved his mistresses too.
Q: Is there one historian that you actually follow or take advice from and why that person? And is there one particular place you have visited that makes you sit down and reflect on Anne Boleyn’s life and just takes your breath away? — Darlene
Claire: Eric Ives is my favourite historian. I love his book on Anne Boleyn and have had the pleasure of grilling him about her on a couple of occasions! He has so much knowledge and his book on Anne is excellent – my favourite. What I love about his work is that he fully references it so that the reader can look up the sources and then make up their own mind.
I was moved visiting Anne Boleyn’s resting place at the Chapel of St Peter ad Vincula but it’s Hever Castle that takes my breath away. Just being there and knowing that it was Anne’s childhood home is a very special feeling. When I’ve run tours there, everyone comments on how magical it is and how at home you feel there.
Q: Do you think that Henry really believed that Anne had been unfaithful with 5 men or was that just a pretext for him to get out of the marriage? — Eliza
Claire: I go round and round in circles trying to figure out what Henry VIII’s role was in Anne’s downfall and what he actually believed. I can’t see how he could have believed it of Anne or of the men involved, men like Norris and George Boleyn who were very close friends of his. When I read of his reaction to news of Catherine Howard’s colourful past – how he wouldn’t believe it and wanted an investigation to clear her name and then how he cried like a baby when it was all proved true – and compare it to the indifference he seemed to show at the allegations concerning Anne, then I can only assume that he knew full well that Anne was not guilty. Cromwell was offering him the chance to get what he wanted, a new start and the possibility of having a son and heir, and he took it.
Q: Do you believe that Anne loved Henry or was it all politics? — Nora
Claire: I don’t think politics came into it as there’s no way that Anne could have known that she’d ever be queen. When Anne refused to be sexually involved with Henry VIII it was surely more likely that he would have moved on to an easier conquest rather than waiting for her and going through what he did to have her. I don’t think Anne loved Henry right from the start, but he was a good-looking, charming and intelligent man, and the two of them had lots in common so I think attraction turned to love quite quickly.
Q: What is your next academic or writing project going to focus on? — Robert
Claire: I’m finishing a book on Anne Boleyn’s fall at the moment.
Q: History likes to blame the infamous Lady Rochford for the fall of George Boleyn. Who really brought up the bogus charges that Anne Boleyn and her brother George committed incest? — Adriane
Claire: I don’t believe that Jane Boleyn, Lady Rochford, has anything to do with the claim of incest. I think that the “one woman” referred to by George Boleyn at his trial was Elizabeth Browne, Countess of Worcester, who accused the Queen of adultery and incest in an argument with her brother, Sir Anthony Browne, over her own misconduct. If she really did say that, I believe it was simply an attempt to justify her own behaviour and to deflect the attention away from her.
Q: Despite her brief time with Elizabeth, what do you think was Anne’s influence (or lack thereof) on Elizabeth as an adult and what do you think the adult Elizabeth thought of her mother? — Kerry
Claire: I believe that in charging her chaplain, Matthew Parker, with the care of Elizabeth if anything happened to her, Anne was actually ensuring that Elizabeth would have the support she needed to be a great woman. Parker was a member of a group of Cambridge men which included the likes of William Cecil and John Dee, men who would be important and influential in Elizabeth’s reign.
Elizabeth’s pre-accession household consisted of many Boleyn relatives so I’m sure that they would have spoken to her about her mother, and she was also close to her Carey cousins during her reign. Elizabeth’s coronation drew on elements from her mother’s coronation and she wore a locket ring containing an image of her mother so her mother was definitely important to her. I think the writings of John Foxe and William Latymer in Elizabeth I’s reign would echo Elizabeth’s belief in her mother’s innocence.
** Thanks so much to Claire for taking the time to answer these questions! You can find her complete book tour schedule here. Remember to check in this Friday, 9 March, when I will announce the winner of Claire’s signed book AND a special surprise!
Win an Autographed Copy of The Anne Boleyn Collection!
Have a question for Claire Ridgway of The Anne Boleyn Files ? Post it in the specified thread on my Facebook page, or e-mail it to me at barbDOTalexanderATyahooDOTcom from now until next Tuesday, 28 February, and become eligible to win an **autographed** copy of Claire’s brand spankin’ new book, The Anne Boleyn Collection!
My blog post with select questions & Claire’s answers will be part of Claire’s virtual tour on 5 March; winner announced on 9 March!
**The fine print: Winner will be randomly selected from all entrants. If your question is not chosen/featured, you are still eligible to win. Multiple questions submitted/chosen do not increase, nor affect in any other way, one’s chance of winning. Okay, I think that’s everything.
Take a Tudor Tour around Washington, DC with Me
My newest YouTube video is now live so go on and check it out as I take you on a tour of Washington, DC looking for any place the Tudors show up (and holy, do my feet hurt!).
There is more information on the Elizabeth I portrait in the National Portrait Gallery here and more on the Edward VI portrait in the National Gallery of Art here. Also, there’s a still photo of Catherine Parr’s prayerbook (from the Folger’s “Shakespeare’s Sisters” exhibition) here.
(Incidentally, if you are on Capitol Hill and feeling peckish, head over to We, the Pizza on Pennsylvania Ave, just a few blocks from the Folger. Yesterday I had a slice of white pizza and a coconut soda…super yum!)
On My SOPA-Box
Just wanted to make everyone aware that, although I’m not blacking my blog out today in support of the SOPA/PIPA protest, it is only because I’m hesitant to download anything on this old computer! I always end up screwing something up when I do downloads and then my systems administrator husband has to deal with the aftermath.
Rest assured that I stand with WordPress and the other striking sites as far as supporting the free exchange of information on the web.
Tudor Cheek Comes to YouTube
There is now a Tudor Tutor channel on YouTube and I just uploaded my first video. Oy, I need better lighting or something!!
How the Mighty Have Fallen
Warning: Incidents of a graphic nature are contained in this post, but this issue is so far under my skin I can’t ignore it today.
High Holy Coach Joe Paterno was fired last night. Let me take out my wee violin for this 84-year-old guy who can no longer coach a sainted college football team. You would think that is the true crime, compared to holding little boys against a shower wall and having your way with them, as the former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky did –while Paterno and quite a few others at Penn State conveniently looked the other way after having done the bare minimum, if anything at all.
Let me be clear on this: When you witness and/or know of a child rape situation, you call emergency services and the police. You don’t give a toss about a university’s insular “chain of command.” You may or may not “approach” the perv-criminal on your own as well. Take that how you wish.
Just how many higher-ups at the university knew about this? Just what were these crimes against young boys? If you have the stomach for it, or just want to feel justified in the immense anger this should stir up, here is the grand jury report. Again, be warned of graphic and extremely disturbing details.
Sandusky should be spending a good long time in prison (and hey, enjoy your showers there, Jerry. I hear they’re quite cosy.) Assistant Coach Mike McQueary was the grad assistant who witnessed the aforementioned incident and yet did not slam this child rapist against the shower wall and hold him there while calling 9-1-1. (Instead, this tall, strapping 28-year-old fled the scene and — are you ready? – told his own dad.)
And yet new coach as of today, Tom Bradley (@TomBradleyPSU, if you care to tweet him), who can call all the shots at this point, maintains that McQueary will coach this Saturday. This coward-witness is easy to pick out, due to his bright ginger hair. That might be a huge negative for McQueary as he stands on the sidelines on Saturday. I’m just sayin’. No, that’s not a threat. Not from me, anyway.
As a lot of you know, although I love Britain and its history, I’m not British. I’m American. In fact, I grew up in South Jersey, a few hours east of this part of rural Pennsylvania that might as well be called The Kingdom of Penn State University, as it is so deeply dependent on the college for financial and status reasons. Seemingly untouchable. Even if it harbors, you know, kid touchers.
We’ve seen this “the higher the mountain, the further the fall” thing numerous times in Tudor history. Cardinal Wolsey, Thomas More, Anne Boleyn, Katherine Howard, Thomas Cromwell, the Brothers Seymour, Lady Jane Grey, Thomas Cranmer, Mary Queen of Scots … all held positions of great power for varying lengths of time, all experienced a devastating and humilating downfall. Even Henry VIII went from Prince of Awesomesauce to Paranoid and Obese King of Legal Homicide.
Thankfully, child rape wasn’t involved for the dynasty. Well, there was the whole Thomas Seymour / Princess Elizabeth thing, but even that isn’t comparable.
Is it a sense of schadenfreude (oooh, that’s just fun to say. Say it with me: SHAY-den-froyd) that winds us up when we watch the once-powerful crash and burn? From the ups and downs of the Tudor dynasty to this week’s horrific findings in the Penn State hierarchy, that might be the case. We’ve yet to learn how history will treat Joe Paterno and the rest of the Penn State Pederast Protection Team. In my opinion, there’s no execution punishment harsh enough.
Take the Official Hollywood vs. History Pledge
There’s been much ado about “Anonymous” lately, as there had been about “Braveheart,” “Elizabeth,” “The Tudors,” “Gladiator,” “The Patriot,” and other portrayals of history in movies and television.
And so, clearly, what we need is the Official Hollywood vs History Pledge!* Please raise your right hand and repeat after me:
“I SHALL NOT get my history from sources of entertainment, such as television and movies. I agree to research further if the history presented in said entertainment sources interests me, & not take the word of a script writer or director over that of historians. I will let entertainers do their thing, and let historians do theirs.”
Feel free to share this pledge with others, for the sake of the facts!
* For simplicity’s sake, the word “Hollywood” is used; however, inaccuracies in media portrayals of history show up in outlets which are not based in Southern California studios. Just a disclaimer.
Oh Boy OR Girl: You Rule!!
Henry VIII is turning over in his grave whilst Catherine of Aragon and her daughter, Mary I, are high-fiving somewhere in the afterlife: Gender-neutral succession has come to the British monarchy, and the heir shall henceforth be permitted to marry — gasp!! — a Catholic.
The news was officially announced this morning.
The Not-So-Great Pretender
I’ve just come across this interesting bit from a 1931 newspaper (and resurrected in a Daily Mail article from several years ago). Have a look!
Apparently, one Anthony Hall (above) had been making his way around England, claiming that he’d been descended from an illegitimate love child of the unmarried Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. In a letter to George V (or as he’d addressed, “Mr. George Frederick Earnest Albert Windsor,” he wrote:
“‘You have no connection with the British Royal Family. You are an outsider. ‘Therefore leave the country. I claim the Crown.”
As King Anthony, 23rd descendant of the House of Tudor, he delivered speeches to large crowds and even threatened to shoot George V “like a dog.”
Fortunately, “King Anthony” died without issue or William might have a real treat on his hands in the future.
Mediocre Expectations
Charles Dickens was a man of many words. Many, many, many, many words. I don’t know how well his books would go over if they were newly-released today because most people have the attention span of a gnat. But part of his appeal, at least to me, is the gorgeous way he serves up succulent sentences full of the finest detail.
I love me some Charles Dickens, but the man could not say the same about our Henry VIII, apparently. In his Child’s History of England (used in British schools well into the 20th century), Mr. Dickens had these many, many words for the much-married monarch:
“Bluff King Hal [was]…one of the most detestable villains that ever drew breath…He was a big, burly, noisy, smelly, small-eyed, large-faced, double-chinned, swinish looking fellow in later life (as we know from the likenessess of him, painted by the famous Hans Holbein), and it is not easy to believe that so bad a character can ever have been veiled under a prepossessing appearance…He was as most intolerable ruffian, a disgrace to human nature, and a blot of blood and grease upon the History of England.”
So, no questions then?
You can read Dickens’ history book online here; if you are only interested in the Tudor bits, they fall between pages 145 and 193.








